• Powered by
  • Newsvine:

 

 

Stories of struggle and recovery in America: Msnbc.com is focusing long-term coverage on the city of Elkhart, Ind. to provide perspective on the national recession. Follow our ongoing coverage on msnbc.com. Want to share your thoughts on the how the recession is playing out in Elkhart or in your community? Comment on any of the blog posts below or become a blog contributor. Learn how

Full coverage | Why Elkhart? | More about our team

Follow this project via ...
advertisement
{"contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"elkhartprojectblog"}

Nonprofits learn to stretch a buck

As the economic downturn began to take its toll in Elkhart, demand for help from the Salvation Army soared.

People who needed aid for utility bills formed lines that snaked out the entryway and onto the street. Demand for free meals and rental assistance skyrocketed.

Meanwhile, local service groups that donated reliably for years were sending smaller contributions — with apologies. The single biggest blow came when the United Way in Elkhart — after suffering a dismal workplace fundraising campaign — slashed its annual allotment to Salvation Army from $90,000 to $40,000.

The Salvation Army's problem in Elkhart — where unemployment is nearing 20 percent — is reflected nationally among nonprofits that provide human services. These groups, which help fill the gaps in large public assistance programs, are swamped by need amid ongoing layoffs and foreclosures, while individual, foundation and corporate donations falter.

Related Articles
Nonprofits learn to stretch a buckAssociated PressFri Jun 50Comments
Fish farming a tough row to hoeThe Elkhart ProjectTue Jun 934Comments
{"contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"elkhartprojectblog"}
  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
{"commentId":7541850,"authorDomain":"widower207"}

This is the perfect opportunity to look into the "administrative" cost of charity.

From the full time fund raisers, professional fund raisers, to advertising companies that exploit this small pool of money, very often, we know that those in need are seldom getting what had been donated to them.

Obama should let the big fat bankers and big over-weighted auto industry people swim or sink by themselves. He should turn his attention to those who are truly poor and in need. He can make sure these people are not being ripped off. He can make sure those who donate will feel fair and that their donations are effective.

It's all about sharing of the wealth. Should we give the money to the charity fund raisers or should we give it to those that are hungry and cold?

{"commentId":7541850,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"widower207"}
    Reply#1 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 12:25 PM EDT
    {"commentId":7545237,"authorDomain":"aguirrejavier"}

    It is not about 'sharing the wealth.' It's more about how is it spent. The reasons for deteriorating budgets and increasing budget deficits is not due to overspending, but rather to mis-spending. Legislators continue to operate under old practices because it ensure job security. The fact that the general population continues to swallow their B.S. only reflects the level of ignorance and the lack of information literacy skills among Americans. This is a systemic problem, not a social problem.

    {"commentId":7545237,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"aguirrejavier"}
    • 1 vote
    #1.1 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 3:13 PM EDT
    {"commentId":7551686,"authorDomain":"msj1977"}

    Freedom isn't free and helping people isn't free. Of course, non-profits are going to have administrative costs. I don't mind costs that are reasonable, but when they are paying people salaries that are larger then some executives at large companies I think there is a problem. When that is happening non-profits are going to pay themselves first.

    {"commentId":7551686,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"msj1977"}
      #1.2 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 10:54 PM EDT
      {"commentId":7581406,"authorDomain":"jlfpublic-sub"}

      As the husband of a non-profit director (who gets paid $25 per hour) the problem isn't the non-profits. It's the wealthy families who set up non-profits as a tax scam. We work with REAL non-profits who try to serve the debris left behind by Capitalism, which says you should die if you can't make enough to support yourself. Elizabeth Dole got $245,000 as Red Cross President..Red Cross total budget at the time $1.4 BILLION dollars.

      Name me ONE for profit that wouldn't be paying the CEO over $10,000,000 for that job.

      {"commentId":7581406,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"jlfpublic-sub"}
      • 1 vote
      #1.3 - Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:14 PM EDT
      {"commentId":7597506,"authorDomain":"aaaaaaaaaa"}

      Over spending is when you spend more than you have - for any reason. Mis-spending is spending money on programs that do not give you the best return on investment. You can instantly reduce mis-spending by reducing overall spending, as some percentage (obviously) is always wasteful where government spending is concerned. All spending plans need to be fully explained and understood (heck, even "read" by the lawmakers) and discussed before any vote is taken. The reason the Federal government can't do this is that they've taken over many of the State's rights (which is unconstitutional), and don't have the time to go over these spending plans, or plainly don't want to. Let the States do what they need to do as represented by the Constitution, and ensure all Federal programs will be correctly researched and discussed which would most definitely reduce waste and overall spending. The State's actions would also more correctly target monies where they would be more wisely spent since they have more stake in the outcome.

      {"commentId":7597506,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"aaaaaaaaaa"}
        #1.4 - Fri Jun 12, 2009 6:51 AM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":7543102,"authorDomain":"bgracieiii"}

        Elkhart residents should be competely disbursed into other communities and the whole town should be shut down. Just because this absolutely boooorrrrrring series would end. Is this thing a permanent project? Give it a rest, the place has less than .00001 percent of the U.S. population.

        {"commentId":7543102,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"bgracieiii"}
        • 2 votes
        Reply#2 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 1:25 PM EDT
        {"commentId":7545312,"authorDomain":"aguirrejavier"}

        Population disbursement is not the answer. Such a naive approach is the reason communities and city governments don't monitor non-profits and ask: If you are solving a problem, then why do you need MORE funding next year instead of LESS? The answer: non-profits are maintenance programs that don't solve problems but simply want to extend their tentacles of influence. Remember that many of those directing these same non-profits are the same liberals who went to school with us in the 70's, marched for civil rights, and called for a successful War on Poverty. Who would've thunk it?

        {"commentId":7545312,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"aguirrejavier"}
          #2.1 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 3:16 PM EDT
          {"commentId":7581534,"authorDomain":"jlfpublic-sub"}

          Aside from the obvious bias javier is correct. non-profits seek to serve a population the rest of us wish would just die and get out of the way...oh, wait, did I just list your non-working grandparents or you disabled son, daughter...hmmm. Well anyway, you get the drift. I would be massively surprised to find non-profits headed by good hard working conservatives. Except of course for the 15% of all non-profits that are really tax scams and pay the family "workers" millions while helping 30 people buy a new computer for school.....

          {"commentId":7581534,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"jlfpublic-sub"}
          • 1 vote
          #2.2 - Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:19 PM EDT
          {"commentId":7585674,"authorDomain":"rrahaman"}

          These people should be lined up and SHOT..............

          OR

          DEPORTED ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

          {"commentId":7585674,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"rrahaman"}
            #2.3 - Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:09 PM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":7543435,"authorDomain":"Beev"}

            Well duh? The unemployed continue to grow. Our screwed up tax policies have sent manufacturing packing. EVERY citizen knows come tax time next year it's going to be brutal. 401ks ruined. Gas on it's way to $3.00+ for good. The stimulus package that'll put our chidren's children into eternal debt; most of the "shovel-ready" jobs will be gone in 6 months....complete ineptitude of our so-called leaders that makes the common man wonder..."who's steering this ship?".

            Yes, when common, hard-working folk are faced with harsh realities like; can we may next month's mortgage? What are the cheapest groceries we can afford?..Charities and good-intentioned organizations become secondary.

            {"commentId":7543435,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"Beev"}
              Reply#3 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 1:42 PM EDT
              {"commentId":7544858,"authorDomain":"rcurtis-1"}

              Why is this not surprising? We have more people who need  help due to a "sociliastic" approach to governing, and a President whose "socilalistic" philosophy is being implemented at every turn. We need "statesmen" who will stand on the principles of our Founder's, on true Capitalism where worker and boss alike work together for the good of the republic, not just for their own selfish ends. May God give us wisdom to do so.

              {"commentId":7544858,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"rcurtis-1"}
                Reply#4 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 2:52 PM EDT
                {"commentId":7545445,"authorDomain":"aguirrejavier"}

                Ignorance is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Funders continue to fund using social criteria as the ruler and fail to consider the need for behavioral and attitudinal changes in society. The evalualtion practices for programs are so lax that non-profits either fluff their reports or engage in duplicity through croney-ism and nepotism. For the few performance- and mission-based non-profits that actually exceed their performance objectives, there is a greater number that are content simply to meet their mediocre objectives. Everything that Obama, state legislators, and non-profits are engaging in has already been done. It is time to do them better. Performance objectives should discourage apathetic and corrupt non-profits to apply for funding because the possibility of disclosure is greater than the opportunity for concealment.

                {"commentId":7545445,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"aguirrejavier"}
                • 1 vote
                #4.1 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 3:23 PM EDT
                Reply
                {"commentId":7545135,"authorDomain":"aguirrejavier"}

                Non-profits have historically become maintenance programs. The old administrative practices and service delivery approaches are obsolete. The search for an immediate solution is characteristic and is based on a crisis mentality. The need is to understand that today's population in need is extremely diverse from the past poverty populaions. The failure of some non-profits to exercise strict performance evaluations are partly to blame for the current position of all non-profits. The apathetic use of non-profits by executive directors as a salary generator instead of a fount of community change only ensures that they will request more funding the following year, instead of less funding because a problem is truly being addressed. What is required is the engineering of a long term solution where non-profits operate under the adage of "our goal is to put ourselves out of a job" and not to act simply as crutches for the government funded poverty programs. REC can offer offer solutions. The face of poverty and its victims has changed. Non-profits cannot continue to be maintenance programs. (, 559-302-7732)

                {"commentId":7545135,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"aguirrejavier"}
                  Reply#5 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 3:06 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":7581651,"authorDomain":"jlfpublic-sub"}

                  Javier, you are correct. Except of course the idea that a non-profit trying to really change anything is doable. In the sixites we called them violent radicals. Today we just ignore them and use the IRS, the Conservative controlled media (Aside from Ted Turner is there a single media mongle who isn't a staunch Conservative? Remember the Dixie Chicks!!!), and the boycott to destroy them.

                  {"commentId":7581651,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"jlfpublic-sub"}
                  • 1 vote
                  #5.1 - Thu Jun 11, 2009 12:24 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  {"commentId":7546471,"authorDomain":"leonardlieberman"}

                  It's a "perfect storm" for non-profits providing human services. Need is up, due to the national recession, and donations are down and any endowment fund earnings are zero this year for that same reason. And when United Ways also experience reduced fund raising totals and reduce allocations, the non-profit providers are squeezed from all directions.

                  Clients may come and go as their intervention gets them back towards self-sufficiency, but the need for job training programs and family counseling programs will ever be with us. And when times get bad and persons are laid off with no job prospects ahead, we see increases in domestic violence, alcohol abuse, child abuse, and other symptoms of wage earner frustration. 

                  For better or worse, government has relied more and more over the past forty yearson the non-profit provider system to be the direct service providers of state agency services. Collaboration? State government has virtually merged with the private sector, yet the partnership is being destroyed by state government's stagnant revenues during the national economic crisis and therefore government's inability to pay for existing or needed expanded services during the recession.

                  Talk to your friends and neighbors on non-profit boards. Most staff have reduced or frozen their salaries, and program cuts are still expected to happen. There may still be some high salaries at the national level for some non-profit agency staff, but these are also their lead lobbyists to the federal government and the cost of living in Washington is a lot higher than in Elkhart. 

                  My advice locally:  be as generous as you can be to your local non-profits, and take a non-profit staffer out to lunch.

                  {"commentId":7546471,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"leonardlieberman"}
                    Reply#6 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 4:23 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":7547847,"authorDomain":"formermichigander"}

                    I've given plenty to charity and volunteered, but when you need help, where are they? Not there for the middle class having a rough time. No one offered to help me with my utility bills, couldn't even tell you where a food bank is, probably in a neighborhood I'm not willing to get out of the car in. I'm sticking to helping the animals, donating food to them, at least they appreciate it and you know where to find a good dog or cat if you need one at your local pound.

                    {"commentId":7547847,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"formermichigander"}
                    • 3 votes
                    Reply#7 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 5:47 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":7548325,"authorDomain":"cny32212"}

                    At last the chickens have come home to roost; high administrative costs have been allowed to go unnoticed, including high salaries for those with the right last name, who do virtually none of the work. Maybe those executives will come to know what it's like to be on the other side of the not-for-profit world. Maybe the boards of the organizations will learn that those people were not needed; the real producers were the ones that were down-sized.

                    {"commentId":7548325,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"cny32212"}
                    • 1 vote
                    Reply#8 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 6:20 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":7548548,"authorDomain":"peteurban1"}

                    if the current administration would reward charitable donations - with increased tax deductions - all those very bad people who make way too much money might donate more instead of less. the administration continues to villify anyone (household) making a six figure income and is doing all sorts of things to "spread the wealth"....in doing so, the alienation of those who "have" will continue to be felt by those who rely on their generosity....but then again, the people spoke with their votes for change.

                    {"commentId":7548548,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"peteurban1"}
                      Reply#9 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 6:34 PM EDT
                      {"commentId":7549673,"authorDomain":"tim-63"}

                      I, too, am sympathetic to causes like the Elkhart Project. I work for a software company in Austin, Texas and was recently moved when one of my customers from the area contacted me for relief from the annual maintenance payment required to retain support for their software. After hearing the story of the troubling times I went to the Elkhart Project site. After reading a few of the heart-wrenching stories, I conceded a percentage of the annual payment due. I hope this small gesture helps their business concentrate on supporting those in need in the area.

                      Because of this chance meeting, I am happy to introduce my effort for relief, CaBaSi. CaBaSi stands for "Cause-based social internetnetworking". We are an online community where members create multiple fundraisers for their charities to help with donations. Donors will use the site to stay in touch with friends and collaborate on ways to help their favorite charities. We intend to not only support the Elkhart Project but also the many other areas in the country that are hurting for funds right now.

                      Please contact us and ask how you can help.

                      {"commentId":7549673,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"tim-63"}
                        Reply#10 - Tue Jun 9, 2009 7:59 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":7553344,"authorDomain":"r-brandow"}

                        I have been a high school coach and a board member of a non-profit childrens organization for the past 13 years. I understand Elkharts dillema and I wish them success. I have been busting my butt for the kid's for the past 13 years and haven't yet lost sight of my goals. The main thing that any organization needs to do whether it be a high school team, corporation, or a non-profit organization is to set both individual and "team" goals. Once you have set your sights on these self made goals failure is not an option. You just don't quit!

                        You can do it Elkhart!!!!!!!!

                        {"commentId":7553344,"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565","authorDomain":"r-brandow"}
                          Reply#11 - Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:30 AM EDT
                          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"599001","isPrivate":false}
                          Leave a Comment:
                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                          {"threadId":"599001","contentId":"2911565"}
                          Start TrackingStart Tracking
                          Stop TrackingStop Tracking